The court dismissed Writ Petition No. 2619 of 1992 for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to supply true copies of pleadings for file reconstruction despite registry intimation.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
oswp2619
1
ssp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2619 OF 1992
Shri N.B.Vaidya & Ors.
vs.
Municipal Corporation of
Greater Mumbai
...Petitioners
...Respondent
None for the Petitioner
Ms Geeta Joglekar for the respondent-MMC
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
REVATI MOHITE DERE,JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 17, 2015
P.C.:
1Notwithstanding intimation given by the
registry to the Advocate for the petitioner, he has
not supplied true copies of the pleadings for
reconstruction of the file.
2There is no record available with the registry
to show that this writ petition has been disposed
of.
3As the petitioner has not come forward for
reconstruction of the record by supplying copies of
the pleadings, if the petition is pending as of
today, the same shall stand dismissed for non
prosecution without further reference to the Court.
4Interim relief, if any, in force shall stand
vacated on expiry of period of four weeks from
today.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
Shri N.B. Vaidya & Ors.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
A.S. Oka
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court