The High Court of Judicature at Bombay granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation and disposed of the matter.
Permission granted to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
pil.213.2014_56.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.213 OF 2014
Vinod Atmaram Patil ... Petitioner
Vs. Kopar Village Panchayat & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr.R.R. Tripathi for the Petitioner Mrs.M.S. Bane, AGP, for Respondent Nos.5 to 7
CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & SHRI C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATE: 16th JANUARY, 2015
P.C.:
The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw
the Public Interest Litigation. Permission is granted.
Public Interest Litigation is disposed of as withdrawn.
(C.V. BHADANG, J.) (VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
1 / 1
Vinod Atmaram Patil
Kopar Village Panchayat
Vasanti A. Naik
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
