Petitioners sought permission to withdraw a writ petition filed against the Administrative Officer. Permission to withdraw was granted by the Court, and the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
wp.231.2013_6.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.231 OF 2013
Smt.Yashoda Pandit Thakur & Ors. ... Petitioners
Vs.
The Adminstrative Officer/Shikshan Pramukh & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr.Anurag jain i/b Global Juris for the Petitioners Mr.Nikhil Vidwans i/b S.J. Rairkar for Respondent No.1
CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & SHRI C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATE: 16th JANUARY, 2015
P.C.:
Mr.Anurag Jain, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioners, who are present in Court, states that the petitioners are not desirous of prosecuting the petition and they may be permitted to withdraw the same.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted. Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(C.V. BHADANG, J.)
(VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
1 / 1
Smt.Yashoda Pandit Thakur & Ors.
The Adminstrative Officer/Shikshan Pramukh & Ors.
Vasanti A. Naik
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
