In a PIL filed by Ankita Kamlesh Shah vs. State Government, the Bench dismissed the petition as infructuous on the ground of efflux of time without issuing substantive orders or directions.
The PIL was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
PIL6-15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Public Interest Litigation No.6 of 2015 (Miss. Ankita Kamlesh Shah .vs. The State Government, through its Chief Secretary and others. )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mrs. S. Jachak, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr. S.M. Puranik, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & P.N. Deshmukh, JJ. DATED : December 3, 2015.
Mr. S.M. Puranik, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 to 4 states that by efflux of time, the petition is rendered infructuous. Public interest litigation is disposed of as such.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
Ankita Kamlesh Shah
State Government
Chief Secretary
B.R. Gavai
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
