This brief notice of motion order allowed the applicant's application to be withdrawn and dismissed. The testamentary suit was also listed for framing issues. No substantive legal reasoning or disposition of the suit is provided.
Notice of Motion allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
45-NMT109-14.DOC
Agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 109 OF 2014
IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 73 OF 2014 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 804 OF 2013
Prakash Ramratan Gupta, through C.A. Rajendra
Anandrao Yadav
In the matter between
Gokuldas Pilar Nayak
Versus
...Applicant.
…Plaintiff
Prakash Ramratan Gupta, through C.A. Rajendra …Defendant
Anandrao Yadav
Mr. Shailesh Jadhav, for the Applicant / Defendant.
Mr. Virendra Kanojia, for the Plaintiff.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 27th January 2015
PC:-
1.On the application of the learned Advocate for the Applicant,
the Notice of Motion is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as
such.
1 of 2
45-NMT109-14.DOC
2.Testamentary Suit No. 73 of 2014 in Testamentary Petition
No. 804 of 2014 to be listed for framing issues.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
Prakash Ramratan Gupta
Gokuldas Pilar Nayak
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court