Allowed withdrawal of testamentary summons upon undertaking to file consent terms from Bombay City Civil Court within one week.
Chamber summons allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
918-CST-148-14.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 148 OF 2014
IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 184 OF 2013
Satyanarayan Munuswamy…Applicant
In the matter between
Andalswamy...Petitioner
Versus
Stayanarayan Munuswamy…Defendant
Mr. S. D. Bhandary, for the Petitioner.
Mr. D. G. Mishra, for the Defendant.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 22nd January 2015
PC:-
1.In view of the Consent Terms filed in the Bombay City Civil
Court Suit No. 3275 of 2010 (originally High Court Suit No. 648 of
2010), the present Chamber Summons is allowed to be withdrawn,
with no order as to costs.
2.Mr. Mishra, learned Advocate for the Applicant, undertakes
to file a copy of the order of the Bombay City Civil Court taking the
1 of 2
918-CST-148-14.DOC
Consent Terms on record. That is to be done within one week from
today.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
Satyanarayan Munuswamy
Andalswamy
Stayanarayan Munuswamy
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court