In a Notice of Motion, the Bombay High Court condoned a 22-day delay in filing an Arbitration Petition. The applicant explained the delay was due to waiting for the complete copy of the arbitrator's award. The motion was allowed.
Delay of 22 days in filing the Arbitration Petition was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14.NMS595_2015.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 595 OF 2015 IN ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 971 OF 2012
Vijaypower Generators Ltd. ... Applicant/Petitioner
Vs.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr. Vishal Kanade i/b. Mr. Sanjay Gawde, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. None for the respondents.
CORAM: R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 6th May, 2015
P.C.:
Learned counsel appearing for the applicant/petitioner states that
the respondents are served and tenders affidavit of service. Affidavit of service is taken on record. None appears for the respondent, though served.
1 / 2
14.NMS595_2015.doc
(R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
2 / 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 22 days in filing the Arbitration Petition should be condoned.
Whether the impugned award had been fully served on the applicant.
Vijaypower Generators Ltd.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
