Petitioner sought liberty to withdraw Arbitration Petition No. 1192 of 2014. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, allowing the withdrawal.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906.arbp1192_2014.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 1192 OF 2014
Rawal Construction ... Petitioner Vs. L & T Finance Ltd. ... Respondent
Ms. Swadha UNS i/b. S.P. Bharti, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. S.I. Joshi a/w. Ms. Nikita Pawar, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM: R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 6th May, 2015
P.C.:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks liberty to
withdraw this Petition.
(R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
1 / 1
Rawal Construction
L & T Finance Ltd.
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
