High Court Bombay dismissed a notice of motion seeking condonation of 2350 days delay to file a written statement in a suit where evidence was completed and the applicant was absent.
None. Notice of motion dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28.NMS-550-2015
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.550 OF 2015
IN SUIT NO.2151 OF 2008
Ashfaque Ahmed Jalil Ahmed & Anr. ….Applicants/ Org. Def. Nos.2 & 3
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
Shehnaz Rashid Hakeem & Ors. ....Plaintiffs V/s. Akhlaque Ahmed Jalil Ahmed & Ors. ....Defendants ----
Mr. Y.S. Bhate for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Omkar Nugwekar i/b. Prabha Badadare for the defendant no.4. Mr. Anurag Gokhale, AGP for the defendant no.5.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 23rd October, 2015
P.C.:-
1 The notice of motion is taken out on behalf of defendant nos.1,2 and 3 to condone the delay of 2350 days, i.e., approximately 6 ½ years and to take the written statement on record. The status of the suit is that the evidence of PW-1 is completed. The applicant is also not present today.
2 Therefore, the notice of motion is dismissed.
(K.R.SHRIRAM,J)
Gauri Gaekwad
28.NMS-550-2015
2
CERTIFICATE
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/Order.
Gauri Gaekwad
Ashfaque Ahmed Jalil Ahmed
Shehnaz Rashid Hakeem
Akhlaque Ahmed Jalil Ahmed
KR SHRIRAM
GAURI GAEKWAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
