Manjit Singh Basant Singh Sandhu v. P.J. Joseph and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
904.s.977.2009==.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3549 OF 2010 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 163 OF 2015 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 574 OF 2015
IN
SUIT NO. 977 OF 2009
Manjit Singh Basant Singh Sandhu
.. Plaintiff
Vs.
P.J. Joseph & Ors. .. Defendants
Mr.Asit Vora i/b Shoaib I. Memon for plaintiff.
Ms.Prachi Khandge i/b M/s. M.P. Vashi & Associates for defendant nos.3, 34, 39 to 41, 43 to 50, 52 to 58, 60 to 69.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATED : 21ST OCTOBER, 2015
P.C.
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 574 OF 2015
1 The counsel for the plaintiff states that the notice upon the respondents were served through substituted service as permitted by this Court. The notice was published in the two newspapers on 30.09.2015 and
the returnable date mentioned therein is 19.10.2015. Nobody is present on behalf of the respondents. Therefore, this chamber summons be listed for
hearing on 17.11.2015 along with notice of motion no.3549 of 2010.
1/2
Shraddha Talekar PA
2
904.s.977.2009==.doc
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 163 OF 2015
3 This chamber summons is taken out on behalf of defendant nos.1 and 70 for leave to amend the written statement that was declared on 8.07.2010. The issues are yet to be framed. In fact, all the defendants have not been served yet and an application to bring on record the legal heirs of some of the defendants is pending. The counsel for the plaintiff having sighed the schedule annexed to the chamber summons and in fairness states that he has no objection if the chamber summons is allowed.
4 In the circumstances, the chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). defendant nos.1 and 70 to amend the written statement and serve a copy of the amended written statement upon the plaintiffs within two weeks from today.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
2/2
Shraddha Talekar PA
K.R. Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court