M/S.Omprakash and Co.and Ors. Vs Juhu Abhishek Apartment Co-Op.Hsg.Socy.Ltd.and Ors.

came to be dismissed on 26^th September, 2011 for want of prosecution because nobody was present for the parties but subsequently the issues covered under the suit have been worked out between the parties. The counsel further states that the plaintiffs have paid a sum of Rs.75,000/- as court fees and if the suit is restored then they would immediately withdraw the suit so that they can apply for refund of court fees.

¶17

Gauri Gaekwad

¶18

2 29.NMS-1148-2013

¶19

2 The counsel for the defendants states that he has no information about the settlement but has no objection if the suit is restored.

¶20

3 In view of the statement made by the counsel for the plaintiffs that they will withdraw the suit, the notice of motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The order dismissing the suit is recalled. The suit is restored to file.

¶21

4 As requested by the counsel for the plaintiffs, suit is allowed to be withdrawn and so disposed. Refund of court fees in accordance with rules.

(K.R.SHRIRAM,J)

Gauri Gaekwad

29.NMS-1148-2013

3

CERTIFICATE

Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/Order.

¶28

Gauri Gaekwad

M/S.Omprakash and Co.and Ors. v. Juhu Abhishek Apartment Co-Op.Hsg.Socy.Ltd.and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Omprakash and Co.and Ors. v. Juhu Abhishek Apartment Co-Op.Hsg.Socy.Ltd.and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Kaka Vs M/S. Dy Star India Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Wanbury Limited Vs Mr. Mehul Shah and Ors.

Seema A.K. Sahu Vs Ramchandra Bhatt and Ors.

Siddarth D. Furia Vs Smt. Sanatoshdevi D. Kachhara and Ors.

Pankaj Ramnikal Shah Vs Priyang Navinchandra Shah

Reliance Power Limited Vs the Statesman Limited and 2 Ors.