Wanbury Limited v. Mr. Mehul Shah and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed notice of motion for recall seeking interim relief due to inordinate delay. Bench also directed Sheriff to report on service to defendant no. 6 and adjourned for issue framing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
22.nms.2335.10.s.2504.10.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2335 OF 2010
IN
SUIT NO. 2304 OF 2010
Wanbury Limited
.. Plaintiff
Vs.
Mr.Mehul Shah & Ors.
.. Defendants
Mr.Rahul Bothra i/b D.H. Law Associates for plaintiff.
Mr.Sanjay Gade i/b Ajay Yadav for defendant no.1.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether application for recall of notice of motion for interim relief should be granted
Whether respondent should be impleaded despite lack of service
Whether Sheriff's office action for service completion required in pending suit
Parties & counsel
- respondent
Mr. Mehul Shah
- respondent
Defendant no.5
- respondent
Defendant no.6
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court