This brief order, dated December 15, 2015, recounts the hearing of an appeal. The court noted the respondents' absence despite service. After condoning a 66-day delay in filing the appeal, the motion to allow the appeal was conditionally allowed for hearing.
Notice of Motion allowed; 66-day delay in filing appeal condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nma.1174.15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1174 OF 2015 IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 555 OF 2015 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3008 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 2678 OF 2010
Parwan Constructions Pvt. Ltd. ...Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
Parwan Constructions Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant Versus Ranjitsingh Linga & Ors. ...Respondents
Ms. Vidita Bhalekar I/b Mr. Sameer Bhalekar for the Applicant/Appellant
None for the Respondents
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. TUESDAY, 15TH DECEMBER, 2015
P.C. :
applicant/appellant. None appears on behalf of the respondents, though served.
in paras 4 and 5 of the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion.
1/2
SQ Pathan
nma.1174.15.doc
2015 and Appeal (Lodging) Nos. 509/2015 and 555 of 2015.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. V. M. KANADE, J.
2/2
SQ Pathan
Parwan Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
Ranjitsingh Linga & Ors.
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
