Gul Khanchand Gidwani and Ors. v. Charulata @ Renuka Haresh Lulla
Case brief
What is this about?
VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APP. 657-14
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL No. 657 OF 2014 IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT No. 76 OF 2006 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION No. 18 OF 1996
Gul Khanchand Gidwani & Ors. … Appellants Vs. Smt. Charulata @ Renuka Haresh Lulla … Respondents
None for the Appellant.
Mr. Sushil K. Chaurasia, for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & REVATI MOHITE-DERE, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 14, 2015 PC.
. None appears on behalf of the Appellant. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents. Matter was fixed specifically for final hearing. It appears that the Appellant is not keen in pursuing this appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Sd/Sd/[REVATI MOHITE-DERE, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Gul Khanchand Gidwani & Ors.
Smt. Charulata @ Renuka Haresh Lulla
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite-Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court