Disposed

Purushottam S/O Ramaji Bhat v. Shikshan Sewa Mandal, Paonar, Thr. Its President and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC3 Mar 2015LPA/126/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This letters patent appeal against a writ petition was disposed of as the appellant did not press the appeal. The court directed the respondent to send a proposal for pensionary and terminal benefits, directing the Accountant General to grant them within three months.

What did the court decide?

Appellant directed to refrain from opposing the petition; Respondent directed to send proposal for benefits within two weeks; Accountant General directed to pay benefits within three months.

Purushottam S/O Ramaji Bhat Vs Shikshan Sewa… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

3.3lpa126.10

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2213 OF 2005. Shri Purshottam s/o Ramaji Bhat .vs. Shikshan Sewa Mandal, Paoner & others

¶5

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶6

Mr. P.D. Meghe, Advocate for appellant,

¶7

Mr. M.V. Samarth, Advocate for respondent no.1, Mr. A.M. Deshpande, A.G.P. for respondent no.3.

¶8

CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & SMT. MRIDULA R. BHATKAR, JJ.

¶9

DATED : MARCH 3, 2015.

¶10

Leave to amend.

¶11

Amendment be carried out forthwith.

¶12

Learned A.G.P. waives notice for the added respondent.

¶13

The learned Counsel for the appellant does not press the appeal. In that view of the matter, the appeal is disposed of.

¶14

However, the respondent no.1 shall send a proposal for making pensionary benefits applicable to the petitioner and also for the other terminal benefits to which the petitioner is entitled to, as per the order passed by the learned Single

¶15

3.3lpa126.10

¶16

¶17

Judge. The same shall be done within a period of two weeks from today. After the receipt of the proposal, the respondent no.3 shall forward the same to the Accountant General, Maharashtra-II, Nagpur within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the proposal from the respondent no.1.

¶18

Since now there are no proceedings pending, the Accountant General shall take appropriate decision and see to it that the pensionary benefits along with the arrears, if any, and the other terminal benefits are in fact paid to the petitioner. The same shall be done in any case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the proposal by the Accountant General from the Education Officer.

¶19

Authenticated copy of the order may be supplied to the parties to act upon.

¶20

Judge

¶21

Judge J.

Purushottam S/O Ramaji Bhat v. Shikshan Sewa Mandal, Paonar, Thr. Its President and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Purushottam S/O Ramaji Bhat v. Shikshan Sewa Mandal, Paonar, Thr. Its President and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Vishwanath Narayanrao Garde Vs Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Washim and 6 Others

Satchikitsa Prasarak Mandal and 3 Others Vs the Mahy.University of Health Sciences,Nashik and 3 Others

Ku. Yogita D/O Harishchandra Kolhekar Vs Zp, Wardha Thr. Its Chief Executive Officer

Subhash Maruti Futane and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Collector, Amravati Division and Another

Laxmibai Wd/O Ishwarchand Joshi and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Chief Secretary, Urban Development Department,Mumbai and Other

Avinash Trimbarao Begade and Others Vs Maroti Govinda Dhiwar (Dead), Kalavati Bewa Maroti Shivarkar and Others