Allowed
Satchikitsa Prasarak Mandal and 3 Others v. the Mahy.University of Health Sciences,Nashik and 3 Others
Bombay HCCAW/307/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2.3CAW.307.15
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
C.A.W. NO. 307/15 IN W.P. NO. 1976 OF 2006 Satchikitsa Prasarak Mandal & others .vs. The Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nasik & others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. V.V. Bhangde, Advocate for petitioners/applicants. Mrs. T.D. Khade, Advocate for respondent nos. 1, 2 & 5, Mr. A.B. Patil, Advocate for respondent no.3, Mr. A. Parchure, Advocate for respondent nos. 3 & 4.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & SMT. MRIDULA R. BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : MARCH 2, 2015.
For the reasons stated, the application is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today.
If the respondents so desire, they may file additional
return within a period of four weeks thereafter.
Judge Judge J.
Satchikitsa Prasarak Mandal & others
The Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nasik & others
B.R. GAVAI
MRIDULA R. BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court