Disposed
Ms. Khairunissa Abdul Karim Shaikh v. Nanasaheb Daulatrao Dubal and Sunanda Nanasaheb and 3 Ors. (Prop. Defendant)
Bombay HCCST/85/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-CST-85-15-TS-40-95.DOC
Sharayu.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 85 OF 2015
IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 40 OF 1995
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 639 OF 1994
Ms. Khairunissa Abdul Karim Shaikh…Applicant
In the matter between
Ms. Khairunissa Abdul Karim Shaikh...Plaintiff
Versus
Mr. Nanasaheb Daulatrao Dubal & Ors....Defendants
Mr. Omar K. Shaikh, for the Plaintiff.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 26th August 2015
PC:-
1.For the reasons set out in the Affidavit in Support, the
Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a)
and (b). Amendment to be carried out on or before 31st August
2015. The newly added Defendants to be served on or before 11th
September 2015. List the matter for directions on 21st September
2015.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Chamber Summons in Testamentary Suit No. 40 of 1995 and Testamentary Petition No. 639 of 1994 should be made absolute.
Ms. Khairunissa Abdul Karim Shaikh
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court