The respondent settled the petitioner's claim via a demand draft, resulting in the withdrawal and disposal of the company petition by the High Court of Bombay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp 95 of 2015 (917).sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.95 OF 2015
M/s. Thyssenkrupp Elevator (India) Pvt. Ltd.
… Petitioner
versus
M/s. Swan Energy Ltd. … Respondent
Mr. Sachin Joshi, for Petitioner.
Mr. Ranjeev Carvalho with Ms. Henna Daulat i/by M/s. Negandhi Shah and Himayatullah, for Respondent.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 6th APRIL, 2015
P.C .
to the Petitioner a Demand Draft of Rs.19,35,180/- in full and final settlement
of the claim of the Petitioner in the above Company Petition. In view thereof, the parties have no claim against each other qua the subject matter of the above Company Petition. The Company Petition is therefore, disposed of as withdrawn.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
1/1
ssp
M/s. Thyssenkrupp Elevator (India) Pvt. Ltd.
M/s. Swan Energy Ltd.
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
