Disposed

Lafarge Aggregates and Concrete India Private Ltd. v. M/S Parinee Realty Private Limited Cin U45200MH1998PTC113833

Bombay HC1 Apr 2015CP/753/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

By consent order, the High Court accepted the respondents' undertaking to pay Rs. 1.8 crore to settle claims. The petitions were disposed of after recording the default clause and waiver of Rule 28 notice.

What did the court decide?

Petitions disposed of by consent after recording respondents' undertaking to pay Rs. 1.8 crore with specific default terms.

Lafarge Aggregates and Concrete India Private Ltd. Vs M/S Parinee Realty Private Limited Cin U45200MH1998PTC113833 — Bombay HC (2015) — LawSathi Research

916-CP-753-2014

Nitin

1 / 3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶5

COMPANY PETITION NO. 753 OF 2014

¶6

Lafarge Aggregates and Concrete India Pvt.Ltd. Versus

¶7

… Petitioner

¶8

M/s. Parinee Realty Private Limited

¶9

… Respondent

¶10

ALONG WITH

¶11

COMPANY PETITION NO. 754 OF 2014

¶12

Lafarge Aggregates and Concrete India Pvt.Ltd. Versus

¶13

… Petitioner

¶14

M/s. Parinee Realtors Private Limited

¶15

… Respondent

¶16

WITH

¶17

COMPANY PETITION NO. 809 OF 2014

¶18

Lafarge Aggregates and Concrete India Pvt.Ltd. Versus

¶19

… Petitioner

¶20

M/s. Parinee Sheltors Private Limited

¶21

… Respondent

¶22

WITH

¶23

COMPANY PETITION NO. 811 OF 2014

¶24

Lafarge Aggregates and Concrete India Pvt.Ltd. Versus

¶25

… Petitioner

¶26

M/s. Greenbird Construction Private Ltd.

¶27

… Respondent

¶28

Mr. Nimay Dave a/w. Mr. F. Sayeed i/b. M.K. Ambalal and Company for the Petitioner.

¶29

Mr. Simil Purohit a/w. Ms. S. Doshi i/b. Vimadalal and Company for the Respondents.

¶30

CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2015

¶31

P.C.

¶32

Nitin

¶33

2 / 3 916-CP-753-2014

¶34

The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner has tendered Draft Amendment. The draft Amendment is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. By consent, the Petitioner is allowed to amend the above Petitions in terms of the Draft Amendment marked “X”. Amendment to be carried out on or before 6^th April, 2015. Reverification is dispensed with.

¶35

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties and the following order is passed by consent :

¶36

i. The Respondents admit that an amount of Rs.1,80,41,064/- is due and payable by the Respondents to the Petitioner, and undertakes that the same shall be paid in full and final settlement of the claims of the Petitioner against the Respondents, as follows :

¶37

a) Rs.90,20,532/- on or before 8^th April, 2015 b) Rs.90,20,532/- on or before 30^th April, 2015

¶38

The undertaking is accepted.

¶39

ii. The above payments shall be made by the Respondent through RTGS, Current Account of the Petitioner in Citibank N.A. Fort Branch, Mumbai being Bank IFSC Code : CITI0100000).

¶40

iii. Upon payment of the entire amount as undertaken by the Respondents in clause (ii) above, the parties shall have no claim against each other.

¶41

Nitin 3 / 3 916-CP-753-2014

¶42

iv. The Respondents have agreed that in the event of the Respondents committing default in payment as undertaken in Clause (i) hereinabove, the Company Petitions shall without reference to this Court revive, stand admitted, made returnable within six weeks from the date of default and advertised in two local newspapers i.e. Free Press Journal (in English) and Navshakti (in Marathi) and in the Maharashtra Government Gazette. The Petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs.10,000/- with the Prothonotary and Senior Master of this Court towards publication charges, within two weeks from the date of default, with intimation to the Company Registrar failing which the Petitions shall stand dismissed for non prosecution. In the event of such default the Official Liquidator shall forthwith stand appointed as provisional Liquidator and shall immediately take charge of the records as well as the movable and immovable properties / assets of the Companies. Notice under Rule 28 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 shall also stand waived on behalf of the Companies.

¶43

v. The Company Petitions are accordingly disposed of.

¶44

(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)

Lafarge Aggregates and Concrete India Private Ltd. v. M/S Parinee Realty Private Limited Cin U45200MH1998PTC113833

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lafarge Aggregates and Concrete India Private Ltd. v. M/S Parinee Realty Private Limited Cin U45200MH1998PTC113833

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharat Jayantilal Patel Vs Official Liquidator of S Kumars Nationwide Ltd. and Another

Supershwa Erectors and Roof System through Mr.a.K.Shah Vs M/S.Mpil Steel Structures Ltd.

Cs India Steel Private Limited Vs Bharti Shipyard Limited

Umesh Gandhi Vs Official Liquidator of M/S. Nisarga Forest (I) Ltd.

Mr. Antony Maharaj Vs Insight Productions Private Limited

Lafarge Aggregates and Concrete India Private Ltd. Vs M/S Parinee Realtors Private Limited Cin U45400MH2010PTC205505