Ms. Julekha Dawood Mutwalli and Anr. v. Mr. Rajendra Mangrulkar, Secretary M.P.S.C. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
pil.65-2013
Dond
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.65 OF 2013
Shri Ashok Ramchandra Metkari & Anr. Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Petitioners
..Respondents.
Mr. Machindra A. Patil for Petitioners. Mr. P.P. Kakade,AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & A.S. GADKARI, JJ. DATE : 25th February 2015. P.C.
1 The Petitioner contended that the State Government had taken
a policy decision to repay Rs.10,000/- to the Depositors of 462 Credit Societies, as it was noticed that due to financial mismanagement those Credit Societies were unable to repay the amount of the Depositors. The State decided to provide loan of about 200 crores to such Societies without charging any interest.
2 The Petitioner's contention is that the State has not taken
necessary steps to recover the amount of Rs.200 crores. On behalf of the Respondents, two affidavits have been so far filed by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Solapur City.
2
pil.65-2013
3 We direct the Respondent No.1-State to file an affidavit in
respect of implementation of the policy decision as reflected in the Government Resolution dated 4th August 2009 and action taken against the defaulting Societies. The State shall explain what stringent steps are taken to recover this amount and against how many Managing Committee Members/Directors action was taken. The State shall explain the status of the criminal cases lodged against the erring persons and to explain as to what preventive steps the State is adopting so that in future recurrence of such incidence is minimised/restricted.
4 Leave to place on record further documents by the Petitioner.
An authenticated copy of this order be provided to the learned AGP.
5 Stand over to 25th March 2015.
(A.S. GADKARI, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
Shri Ashok Ramchandra Metkari & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
Naresh H. Patil
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court