This is a single-line order regarding a civil application in a contempt petition. The court held the contempt petition was dismissed as withdrawn, resulting in the disposal of the civil application as well.
The Civil Application was disposed of as the Contempt Petition stood dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
can.9-2014.sxw
Dond
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9 OF 2014 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.65 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. Ranjeet Patil i/b Mr. K.S. Patil for Petitioners. Mr. Siddhesh Pilankar i/b Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for Applicant.
Mr. A.B. Vagyani, GP with Mr. P.G. Sawant,AGP for State.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & A.S GADKARI, JJ.
DATE : 25th February 2015.
P.C.:
Since the Contempt Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, nothing survives in the Civil Application and the same is disposed of accordingly.
(A.S. GADKARI,J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)
1 of 2
can.9-2014.sxw
2 of 2
Petitioners
Applicant
State
NARESH H. PATIL
A.S GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
