Dismissed
Sanjay Babuamal Singhi v. State of Maharashtra, through Its Principal Secretary to the Ministry of Revenue and Anr.
Bombay HCCP/503/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In Contempt Petitions Nos. 503 of 2013 and 31 of 2014, the Division Bench held that no case for contempt existed because the impugned order dated 13th May 2013 had already been complied with. The petitions were disposed of.
What did the court decide?
The petitions were disposed of holding that no case for contempt was made out.