IN THE HIGH COURT
The Chamber Summons was allowed permitting amendment of the Plaint and Proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
925-CHS-690-2014
Nitin
1 / 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 690 OF 2014
IN
SUIT NO. 457 OF 2013
The Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai … Applicant / Plaintiff Versus Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board and Ors. … Defendants And State of Chattisgarh … Respondent
Mr. Pinto i/b. Mulla and Mulla for the Applicant / Plaintiff. Mr. R.J. Mane, AGP for Defendant Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Sanjay Udeshi for Defendant Nos. 4 and 5.
Ms. Simeen Shaikh a/w. Ms. Rashmi Patil i/b. S.K. Srivastav for Defendant No. 6.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 14TH JULY, 2015
P.C.:
thereto. For the reasons set out in the Affidavit in support of the Chamber
Summons, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses
(a) and (b), which are reproduced hereunder :
“(a) That the Plaintiffs be granted leave to amend the
Plaint and Proceedings in the above Suit in terms of the
Schedule annexed hereto ;
2 / 2 925-CHS-690-2014
Nitin
(b) that the Plaintiffs be allowed to carry out all
consequential amendments”.
(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)
The Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai
State of Chattisgarh
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
