Mrs.Ratnam Nair v. M/S.Vama Sarup Construction and 9 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
chs 632 of 2014 (946).sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.632 OF 2014 IN
SUIT NO.317 OF 2014
Ratnam Nair … Applicant/Plaintiff versus M/s. Vama Sarup Construction and Ors. … Defendants and Padma M. Odhrani and Anr. … Respondents
Mr. S.K.Dubey, for Plaintiffs.
Mr. Madhur Rai i/by M/s. PRS Legal, for Defendant Nos.6, 8 and 9. Mr. Ashraf Diamondwala i/by M/s. Diamondwala and Co., for Defendant No.3.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 13th JULY, 2015
P.C.:
- Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Perused the Chamber Summons and the Affidavit in support thereto. The Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which is reproduced hereunder :
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ratnam Nair
- respondent
M/s. Vama Sarup Construction and Ors.
- respondent
Padma M. Odhrani and Anr.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court