The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal for lack of substantial question of law but granted a one-time extension of eight weeks for deposit of the impugned order amount under the Central Excise Act, 1944, restoring the matter to its file upon compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CEXA.14.2014.20.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2014
M/s. Shri. Nainadevi Steel } Casting P. Ltd. and Anr. } Appellants versus Union of India and Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Ashok Singh for the Appellants. None for the Respondents.
CORAM :- S.C.DHARMADHIKARI & S.P.DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED :- JANUARY 5, 2015
P.C. :-
After having heard Mr. Singh for some time and expressing our disinclination to entertain this Appeal, as it does not involve any substantial question of law, all that Mr. Singh prays is grant of additional time to comply with the Tribunal's interim order. We accede to his request and direct that if the amount in terms of the impugned order is paid/deposited within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the Tribunal to restore the Appeal to its file and for being disposed of on its own merits and in accordance with law. We would not extend this time any further. In the event there is no compliance reported, the Tribunal's order dismissing the Appeal to stand. The present Appeal is disposed of accordingly.
(S.P.DESHMUKH, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
M/s. Shri. Nainadevi Steel Casting P. Ltd.
Union of India
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
S.P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
