The petitioner accepted that subsequent developments made this writ petition infructuous, leading to its dismissal.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.12063.2013.8.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 12063 OF 2013
Backbone Projects Limited } Petitioner versus The Union of India and Ors. } Respondents
Mr. V. Sridharan-Senior Advocate with Mr.Prakash Shah and Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/b. M/s. PDS Legal for the Petitioner.
Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly with Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra for the Respondents.
CORAM :- S.C.DHARMADHIKARI & S.P.DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED :- JANUARY 5, 2015
P.C. :-
Mr. Sridharan fairly states that in the light of subsequent developments, this Writ Petition has become infructuous. Accepting the statement of Mr. Sridharan, we dismiss the Writ Petition as infructuous.
(S.P.DESHMUKH, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
Backbone Projects Limited
The Union of India
S.C. Dharmaidhikari
S.P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
