This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 1
904-caw772.15.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 772 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3757 OF 2013
Rekha Jagdish Varsolkar Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….Applicant
….Respondents.
Mr. R.K. Mendadkar a/w Ms. Helen Koli-Mandlik for the Applicant. Mr. V.N. Sagare, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND
M.S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 8 APRIL 2015.
P.C.:-
Heard finally by consent of the parties.
2 Considering the certificate below Exhibit “B” dated 14 January
2015 and the reasons already provided, we are inclined to modify the Judgment dated 4 April 2014 by correcting the operative order Clause (d) to the following extent.
3 In Judgment dated 4 April 2014, page No.4, in operative order prayer clause (d), the word “Koli” be replaced by the words “Hindu Vaity” . Judgment dated 4 April 2014 is corrected accordingly.
4 Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
(M.S. SONAK, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
1/1
Rekha Jagdish Varsolkar
State of Maharashtra
Anoop V. Mohta
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
