This chamber review petition was dismissed as there was no error apparent on the face of the record, following previous reasoning.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
dgm 1
chamber matter db - rpw-13-15.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITIION NO. 13 OF 2015
IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9845 OF 2013
Shashibhushan Maruti Hole vs
.... Petitioner
State of Maharashtra & ors. … Respondents
Mr. Siddhartha R. Ronghe for the petitioner. Mr. Amit B. Borkar for respondents 3, 6 and 23.
Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni with Mr. Manoj Badgujar for Respondent No.2.
Mr. A.I.Patel, AGP for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : February 13, 2015 (IN CHAMBER)
P.C.:
Heard.
2 There is no error apparent on the face of the record. Therefore, for the reason already recorded, we are not inclined to entertain the review petition. The Review Petition is dismissed. No costs.
(M. S. SONAK,J)
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
1/1
Shashibhushan Maruti Hole
State of Maharashtra
Anoop V. Mohta
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
