Dismissed

Narayan Gangaram Shettiwar v. the Mahatashtra State Warehousing Corporation, through Its Chairman and Managing Director and 3 Oth

Bombay HC17 Apr 2015CAW/3472/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench rejected a Civil Application filed by an applicant seeking permission to withdraw court-deposited funds. The court issued the order wherein noted that previous directions had prohibited such withdrawal. The application is dismissed. The court mentions the applicant had received substantial retiral benefits.

What the court decided

AI extract

Narayan Gangaram Shettiwar Vs the Mahatashtra State… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

1 17.04.caw.3472.14.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 34722014

¶3

IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1165 /2011 ( Narayan Gangaram Shettiwar vs. The Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation and others )

¶4

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶5

Mr.A.C.Dharmadhikari, Advocate for petitioner/applicant Mr N R Saboo, Adv.for respondent no.1. Mr. S.M.Bhagde, Assistant Govt.Pleader for respondent no.3

¶6

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & A.M. BADAR, JJ.

¶7

DATED : 17^th April, 2015.

¶8

Heard .

¶9

The applicant has filed the vexatious application for permission to withdraw the amount deposited in this Court.

¶10

On hearing the learned counsel for the applicant and the respondents, this Court had, by an order dated 10^th May, 2012 directed the respondent no.1 to deposit the amount so that the same could be placed in a fixed deposit account of a nationalized bank. This Court had further directed that the said amount be deposited initially for a period of one year, to be renewed from time to time, during the pendency of the Writ Petition. This Court was not inclined to permit the petitioner to withdraw the amount. In this background, the applicant ought not have made an application for withdrawal of the balance amount, especially when the applicant had received a substantial amount towards retiral benefits.

¶11

The Civil Application stands rejected.

¶12

JUDGEJUDGE

¶13

sahare

Narayan Gangaram Shettiwar v. the Mahatashtra State Warehousing Corporation, through Its Chairman and Managing Director and 3 Oth

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Narayan Gangaram Shettiwar v. the Mahatashtra State Warehousing Corporation, through Its Chairman and Managing Director and 3 Oth

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vivek Ramchandra Vishwarupe Vs Sant Gadgebaba Amravati University, Amravati through Its Registrar and Another

Dilipkumar S/O Asaram Meshram Vs Smt. Swarnalata Bhimrao Ghodeswar, Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Bhandara

Anand S/O Sitaram Gondane Vs Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Division, Nagpur and Another

Ku. Vijaya D/O Madhaorao Rajput Vs State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Social Justice and Empowerment Dept. Mumbai and 2 Other

Arpit Prakash Nimje Vs the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur

Chandrakant S/O Dayaram Mundhre Vs Director, Directorate of Sericulture (Textile Department), Nagpur and 2 Others