Disposed

Sunil S/O Gayaprasad Mishra v. the Vice Chancellor, Rtm Nagpur University, Nagpur and 3 Others

Bombay HC31 Mar 2015CAW/3050/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dealt with a civil application and a writ petition concerning educational regulations. Observing that orders may affect current students, the court disposed of the civil application as infructuous and granted four weeks time in the writ petition for the petitioner to submit data on the present situation.

What did the court decide?

Dismissed the civil application as infructuous; granted four weeks time to the petitioner in the writ petition to submit data on current student status.

Sunil S/O Gayaprasad Mishra Vs the Vice Chancellor… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

31032015cawno.3050.2013 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

Civil Application (W) No. 3050 of 2013 in W.P.No. 2448 of 2013

¶4

Sunil s/o Gayaprasad Mishra vs. The Vice Chancellor R.T.M.Nagpur University, Nagpur and others.

¶5

Notes, Office Memoranda of

¶6

Coram, appearances, Court's orders

¶7

or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶8

Court’s or Judge’s Orders.

¶9

The petitioner in person. Shri A.M.Gordey, Senior Counsel with Shri S.M.Puranik, Advocate for R-1 to 3.

¶10

CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI &

¶11

S.B.SHUKRE, JJ DATE : 31.3.2015

¶12

Heard.

¶13

The prayers are in the light of the position prevailing in

¶14

the year 2013. Effort of Shri Sunil Mishra is to demonstrate that his grievance is not qua particular students or in relation to a particular year or a particular institution. However, when the order is to be passed against the students, who have taken admission, their status as on today needs to be looked into. On the basis of the position pointed out in the year 2013, orders cannot be passed against the students, who are undergoing education to-day. Hence, with liberty to Shri Sunil Mishra to point out the situation and position of the students as on today in any of the Professional

¶15

31032015cawno.3050.2013 2

¶16

College and to move appropriate application to protect the standard of their education and interest, we dispose of this Civil Application as infructuous.

¶17

Writ Petition No. 2448 of 2013:

¶18

Last orders in this matter are passed by this Court on 14.8.2014. Learned Senior Advocate Shri Gordey has attempted to demonstrate that thereafter there have been some developments and the position presented to this court on that day is no longer available. Mr. Mishra is disputing this. Again as our orders will affect the students who are undergoing education today, in absence of any data about such students on record, we are not in a position to pass orders. Hence, we grant time of four weeks initially to point out the subsequent developments and today’s position so as to enable this court to appreciate the same. If the petitioner seeks any information from the University for the said purpose, the respondent University shall arrange to supply it, in accordance with law, at the earliest. List the petition after four weeks.

¶19

Civil Application (W) No. 534 of 2015 in W.P.No. 2448 of 2013:

¶20

List this Civil Application on 9.4.2015.

¶21

JUDGE JUDGE

¶22

31032015cawno.3050.2013 3

Sunil S/O Gayaprasad Mishra v. the Vice Chancellor, Rtm Nagpur University, Nagpur and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil S/O Gayaprasad Mishra v. the Vice Chancellor, Rtm Nagpur University, Nagpur and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankarlal Balramdas Gurbani and Another Vs Hdfc Bank Ltd., Akola through Its Branch Manager and 2 Others

Dadarao Gopalrao Ambhore and Anr. Vs Central Mine Planning and Design Institute Ltd. and 2 Ors.

Nandkishor Manikrao Jagtap Vs Shivaji Education Society, through Its President, Amravati and Another

Shyamrao S/O Narayan Madase Vs Western Coalfields Limited (a Government of India Undertaking) Thr. Chairman and Another

Subodhkumar S/O Raghunath Agrawal through His P.O.A. Shri Raghunathdas Ramsaran Gupta Vs Shri Dadarao Dolarkar, the Chief Officer the Municipal Council, Karanja (Lad)

Bhimrao S/O Ramji Gedam Vs the State of Mah. Thr. the Principal Secretary, Urban Development Dept. and Another