The Court rejected the Civil Application seeking priority to hear a Writ Petition of 2013, noting that original and appellate writ petitions have been pending since 1990, making no case for prioritizing cases from 2013.
Civil Application is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw2510
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2510 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2890 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Madhav Jamdar for the Applicant
Mr.V.P.Malvankar, AGP `A' Panel for the Respondent
Nos.1 and 2
Mr.Rajesh Patil for respondent Nos.15 to 30.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
V.L.ACHLIYA,JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 9, 2015.
P.C.
1Original Side Writ Petitions are
pending for final hearing from the year
1990 onwards. Same is the case with
the Appellate Side Writ Petitions.
Hence, no case is made out for giving
priority to the hearing of the Writ
Petition of 2013. Civil Application is
rejected.
(V.L.ACHLIYA,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
Certified to be true and correct copy
of original signed Judgment/Order.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether priority to hearing the Writ Petition of 2013 can be granted when Original and Appellate Side Writ Petitions have been pending since 1990.
S.S.P.
Respondent
A.S.OKA
V.L.ACHIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court