Since the petitioner has passed away, the challenge to the impugned order has become academic. No adjudication on merits was made. This short order dismisses the writ petition because the controversy no longer subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp8752
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8752 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Amit Borkar for the Petitioner
Ms M.P.Thakur, AGP for the Respondent Nos.2 and 4.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
V.L.ACHLIYA,JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 9, 2015.
P.C.
1Perused the impugned order. With
the passage of time, the challenge in
the petition has become academic.
Accordingly, writ petition is disposed
of.
2We, however, make it clear that no
adjudication has been made on merits.
2 wp8752
CERTIFICATE
Certified to be true and correct copy
of original signed Judgment/Order.
Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax
Respondent Nos. 2 and 4
A.S.Oka
V.L.Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court