The High Court disposed of the civil application because the court had already interviewed the children on 15th April 2015, rendering the claimed reliefs redundant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
78-15-cam=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 78 OF 2015
IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 142 OF 2014.
Sonia Kunwar Singh Bedi
.. Applicant
v/s.
Kunwar Singh Bedi
..Respondent
Mr. Robin Jaisinghani a/w Mr. Nirman Sharma i/b Dastur Dadhich & Kalambi for the applicant
Mr. Deshmukh i/b U.P. Warunjikar for the respondent
CORAM: RANJIT MORE &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED: 6th MAY, 2015. P.C.
15th April, 2015, reliefs claimed in this application do not survive
for consideration.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) ( RANJIT MORE, J.)
1 of 1
Uday S. Jagtap
Sonia Kunwar Singh Bedi
Kunwar Singh Bedi
RANJIT MORE
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
