This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26 caa 496-14=.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 496 OF 2014 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO. 9679 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders
None for the applicant.
Mr. Kuldeep Patil for the respondent.
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATED : 27/01/2015.
P.C.:
2 Office note shows that on earlier occasion also on one appeared on behalf of applicant. Hence, dismissed for default.
3 In view of dismissal of Civil Application, nothing survives in the Appeal from Order. Hence, registration of Appeal from Order stands rejected.
(K.K.TATED, J.)
1/1
Sneha Chavan
Sneha Chavan
Respondent
K. K. TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
