An appeal and a civil application were dismissed for default due to the appellant's non-appearance. Consequently, the civil application was dismissed as infructuous.
The appeal is dismissed. The civil application No. 557 of 2013 is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
52 ao 453-13=.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 453 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 557 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders
None for the appellant/applicant. Mr. Kuldeep Patil for the respondent.
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATED : 27/01/2015.
P.C.:
. None for the appellant. Mr. Patil for the respondent.
2 Office note shows that no one appeared on behalf of appellant on 16.06.2014, 14.07.2014 and today also.
3 Hence, Appeal from Order stands dismissed for default.
4 In view of dismissal of Appeal from Order, nothing survives in Civil Application. Same is also dismissed as infructuous.
(K.K.TATED, J.)
1/1
Sneha Chavan
Appellant
Respondent
K. K. TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
