The High Court at Bombay allowed a civil application filed by the original Plaintiff seeking condonation of a 35-day delay in filing an appeal. The court was satisfied that sufficient cause existed and ordered the appeal be placed on board.
The Civil Application is allowed to condone a delay of 35 days in filing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
220.15-caa
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.220 OF 2015
IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO.3626 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. D. D. Singh for the Applicant
Mr. Milan Desai i/b. T. R. Patel for Respondent No.1.
Mr. Vinod Mahadik for Municipal Corporation
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 23, 2015
P.C.:
Basavraj G Patil
1/2
220.15-caa
A) Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads thus:
(a) That delay of 35 days in filing the aforesaid appeal be condoned in the interest of justice.
B) Civil Application stands disposed off accordingly.
C) Office is directed to place the Appeal from Order on board on 23/03/2015, if all office objections are removed within two weeks from today, failing which the Appeal from Order shall stand dismissed without further reference to the court.
JUDGE
Basavraj G Patil
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause exists for condoning a 35-day delay in filing an appeal.
Whether the application for condonation of time should be allowed.
Basavraj G Patil
Municipal Corporation
K. K. Tated
Basavraj G Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
