Dismissed
Madhav Krushna Divekar and Ors. v. Nansukhlal Punamchand Gugale
Bombay HCFA/636/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pr3 fa636-12.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO.636 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1386 OF 2012 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.636 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr.Rupesh Nalawade for the appellant Mr.Lalasaheb Bendal i/b Mr.B.R.Deshmukh for the respondent
CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATED : 20/02/2015
PC :
1 Not on board. At the request of Advocate for the appellant, matter is taken on board for urgent orders.
2 Both the counsel state that matter is settled out of court. They tendered Consent Terms dated 19.2.2015 duly signed by the appellant as well as respondent and their respective counsel.
3 Same is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
4 Consent Terms be treated as part and parcel of decree.
5 First Appeal is disposed of in terms of
Mohite
pr3 fa636-12.doc
Consent Terms. In view thereof, Civil Application does not survive. The same is also dismissed as infructuous.
(K.K.TATED, J.)
2/2
Mohite
Rupesh Nalawade
Lalasaheb Bendal
K.K.TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court