An application under Order XLI Rule 292 CPC for condonation of 64 days delay in filing an appeal was heard. Routine steps were taken including permission for private service of notice and dismissal if bhatta charges are not paid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10.15-caa
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10 OF 2015
IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO.292 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. R. V. Bansode for the Applicant
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : JANUARY 19, 2015
P.C.:
Rule made returnable after 12 weeks.
JUDGE
Basavraj G Patil
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether 64 days delay in filing an appeal requires condonation of.
Original Plaintiff
K. K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
