The appeal from Order was withdrawn. The withdrawal was allowed and the appeal was dismissed. Being consequential to the withdrawal, the pending Civil Application was also held to be infructuous and dismissed.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; Civil Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
556.13-ao
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION.
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.556 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. Akhileshkumar Sharma i/b. A. M. Saraogi for the Appellant.
Mr. Yusuf Rampurwala i/b. Deepa Pohuja for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : JANUARY 19, 2015
P.C.:
JUDGE
Basavraj G Patil
1/1
Appellant
Respondent No.2
K. K. TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
