Dismissed
Dnyaneshwar Vitthal Surase and Ors. v. Kamalbai Raghunath Jadhav and Ors.
Bombay HCCA/819/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
in SA 58/10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.819/2011 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.58/2010
Dnyaneshwar Vitthal Surase & others.
...Applicants..
Versus
Sau.Kamalbai Raghunath Jadhav
and others.
...Respondents...
.....
None present for applicants.
Shri B.R. Kedar, Advocate for respondent nos.1 to 6.
.....
CORAM: N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE: 17.07.2015
ORDER :
This is an application for recording compromise. As
the parties are not present in spite of sufficient
opportunity, the civil application is dismissed for want
of prosecution.
ndk/ c1771530.doc
Dnyaneshwar Vitthal Surase & others
Sau. Kamalbai Raghunath Jadhav
N.W. SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court