The single judge court allowed a civil application under a Bombay High Court second appeal proceeding. The court directed the carrying out of an appropriate amendment within two weeks from the date of the order.
Civil application allowed; appropriate amendment directed to be carried out within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CA 2560/14 in SA 743/12
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2560/2014 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.743/2012
Rashid Karim Pathan & another.
...Applicants..
Versus
Sardar Karim Pathan.
...Respondent...
.....
Shri P.F. Patni, Advocate for applicants.
Shri A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent nos.1B to 1I.
.....
CORAM: N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE: 17.07.2015
ORDER :
For the reasons stated in the application, civil
application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).
Appropriate amendment be carried out within two weeks
from today.
(N.W. SAMBRE, J.)
ndk/ c1771521.doc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil application should be allowed based on the stated reasons.
Sardar Karim Pathan
N.W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court