The High Court held that a writ petition challenging a reduction in pay due to misconduct is infructuous and clearly dismissed it because the petitioner had already filed and exhausted the statutory appeal under the CDA Regulations, which was subsequently dismissed.
No relief; the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP1944.2002.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1944 OF 2002
JITENDRA PRASAD MATHUR
VERSUS THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS.
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. A B Kadethankar Advocate for Respondents : Mr. P.G. Godhamgaonkar
CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: January 09, 2015
PER COURT :-
WP1944.2002.odt
dated 8.10.2002. If an appeal is provided and such remedy is availed by the petitioner, we do not see any reason why we should entertain this petition on merits.
( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. )
aaa/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition regarding disciplinary punishment becomes infructuous when the alternative statutory appeal has already been dismissed.
Jitendra Prasad Mathur
The Airport Authority of India
A.V. Nirude
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
