The Bombay High Court disposed of an arbitration petition upon the filing of signed consent terms and a demand draft confirming settlement between the parties.
Arbitration petition disposed of in terms of the consent terms; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
arbp500-13
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.500 OF 2013
Shriprakash V. Sardesai V/s.
...Petitioner
Kotak Mahindra Investments Ltd. ...Respondent
Mr.Deepak Dhane i/b Joby Mathew & Associates for the Petitioner. Mr.Chetan Udeshi, Representative of the Respondent present.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 6TH APRIL, 2015.
P.C. :-
1/2
arbp500-13
Directors of the respondent company, authorizing Mr.Chetan Udeshi to sign the consent terms are taken on record.
2/2
Shriprakash V. Sardesai
Kotak Mahindra Investments Ltd.
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
