Petitioner sought to withdraw Arbitration Petition No. 483 of 2014 regarding a logo usage dispute. The court accepted the withdrawal and granted liberty to file a fresh petition if advised.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition if so advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
964-ARBP-483-2014
Nitin
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 483 OF 2014
Diligent Media Corporation Limited … Petitioner Versus
Media Research User Council & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Urvaksh Unklesariya i/b. Bachubhai Munim & Company for the Petitioner.
Mr. M. Behl a/w. Mr. Levi Rubens, Mr. Sujit S., Mr. Pratik Shah and Ms. Indrayani Deshmukh i/b. Vigil Juris for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Nishad Nadkarni i/b. Legasis Partners for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 6TH JANUARY, 2015
P.C.
The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner on
instructions seeks to withdraw the above Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition, if so advised. He also states that the Respondent No. 2 is using the Mast Head / logo which cannot be used by them. The learned Advocate appearing for Respondent No. 2 on instructions states that except at the time of carrying out the survey Respondent No. 2 has never
used the Mast Head / Logo. The statement is accepted. The above Petition is therefore disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought.
(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)
Diligent Media Corporation Limited
Media Research User Council
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
