The Bombay High Court accepted the Petitioner's request to refer the dispute to the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas while ordering the Respondent to continue gas supply in the meantime.
Orders Respondent to refer case to Ministry and continue gas supply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MNOB-ARBPL-118-2015
1
Nitin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 118 OF 2015
JSW Steel Limited … Petitioner
Versus
GAIL (India) Limited … Respondent
Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Sr. Adv. a/w. Mr. Karl Tamboly, Mr. M.P. Bharucha, Ms. Nandini Singh, Ms. Shreya Ramesh i/b. Bharucha and Partners for the Petitiner.
Mr. Shanmugha T. Pillai, Deputy Manager (Law) of the Respondent, present in person.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 20TH JANUARY, 2015
P.C.
Respondent – GAIL (India) Limited is present in Court. He has tendered a letter dated 21st February, 2012 addressed by the Ministry of Petroleum
and Natural Gas to the Chairman and Managing Director, GAIL (India) Limited, New Delhi wherein it is stated as follows :
“In cases where there has been change in constitution / ownership / location after 11.3.2010 and are not covered under
the guidelines, the cases may be referred to the Ministry with
recommendations of GAIL along with substantiating
documents”.
Nitin 2 MNOB-ARBPL-118-2015
A copy of the said letter dated 21st February, 2012 is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)
JSW Steel Limited
GAIL (India) Limited
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
