The single judge order records revised consent terms signed by the parties and their advocates, marking them on record, and passes an order in terms of the same.
Order dismissing the petition in terms of the consent terms marked 'X-1'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp 280 of 2014 (984).sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.280 OF 2014
M/s. Fosroc Chemicals (India) Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner V/s. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. … Respondent
Mr. Mikhail Dey i/by M/s. Dinesh Tiwari and Associates, for Petitioner. Mr. K.S.S.Murthy, Asstt. Manager of Petitioner, present. Mr. Karl Tamboly i/by M/s. Haresh Joshi and Co., for Respondent. Mr. U. Joshi, Procurement Manager of Respondent, present.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 19th JANUARY, 2015
P.C .
Consent Terms dated 19-01-2015. They submit that the revised Consent Terms be taken on record and an order be passed in terms of the said Consent Terms. The revised Consent Terms dated 19-01-2015 are taken on record and marked 'X-1' for identification. The said Consent Terms are signed by the Authorized Signatory of the Petitioner and the Authorized Signatory of the Respondent,
who are present in Court. The Consent Terms are also signed by the respective
Advocates for the parties. Order in terms of the Consent Terms marked 'X-1'.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
1/1
ssp
M/s. Fosroc Chemicals (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
