The High Court disposed of two arbitration petitions based on unsigned consent terms submitted by the parties' advocates. The consent terms were taken on record and the petitions were disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
arbpl 1360 of 2014 (1034).sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.1360 OF 2014
Gili India Ltd. … Petitioner versus Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd. … Respondent
WITH
ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.1361 OF 2014
Gili India Ltd. … Petitioner
versus Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd. … Respondent
Mr. Vivek Vashi with Ms. Hrushi N. Mr. K. Satya i/by M/s. Bharucha and Partners, for Petitioner.
Mr. Sneh Mehta with Ms. Jhui Mathur i/by M/s. Wadia Ghandy and Co., for Respondent.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 21st JANUARY, 2015
P.C.:
Consent Terms dated 21-01-2015. They submit that the Consent Terms be
taken on record and the above Arbitration Petitions be disposed of in terms of
the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X'
for identification. The Consent Terms are signed by the Authorized Representatives of the Petitioner and the Respondent. The Consent Terms are
1/2
ssp
arbpl 1360 of 2014 (1034).sxw
also signed by the respective Advocates for the parties. The above Arbitration
Petitions are disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms, marked 'X'.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
2/2
ssp
Gili India Ltd.
Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd.
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
