Tata Capital Financial Services Limited v. Umesh Pednekar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2015 (909).sxw IN THE HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crr 24 of 2015 (909).sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COURT RECEIVER'S REPORT NO.24 OF 2015 IN ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.433 OF 2014
Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. … Petitioner versus Umesh Pednekar and Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Nikhil Mehta i/by M/s. KMC Legal Ventures, for Petitioner. Mr. N.A.Bandodkar, 2nd Assistant to the Court Receiver, present.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 21st JANUARY, 2015
P.C.:
for the Petitioner has not lodged the order with the Office of the Court Receiver. In view thereof, the Court Receiver has taken out the above Report seeking discharge in the matter. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner admits his mistake in not lodging the order with the office of the Court Receiver and states that the same is due to inadvertence on his part. In view thereof, the Advocate for the Petitioner is allowed to lodge the order with the office of the Court Receiver on or before 28-01-2015. The Petitioner shall pay
1/2
ssp
crr 24 of 2015 (909).sxw
costs of this Report on or before 28-01-2014. The Court Receiver's Report is accordingly disposed of.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
2/2
ssp
Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd.
Umesh Pednekar
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court