Arbitration petition wherein the petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition. The High Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition if advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nitin
1
904-ARBP-125-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 125 OF 2015
Tata Capital Financial Services Limited … Petitioner Versus
Damodaran Engineering Constructions & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Nikhil Mehta i/b. KMC Legal Venture for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 27TH JANUARY, 2015
P.C.
The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner on instructions seeks to withdraw the above Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition, if so advised. The above Petition is therefore disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought.
(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)
Tata Capital Financial Services Limited
Damodaran Engineering Constructions & Anr.
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
