The High Court of Bombay disposed of Arbitration Petition No. 127 of 2015 as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel with liberty to file a fresh petition. No substantive legal issue was determined.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nitin
1 905-ARBP-127-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 127 OF 2015
Tata Capital Financial Services Limited … Petitioner Versus Vishal Gidde … Respondent
Mr. Nikhil Mehta i/b. KMC Legal Venture for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATED : 27TH JANUARY, 2015
P.C.
The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner on instructions seeks to withdraw the above Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition, if so advised. The above Petition is therefore disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought.
(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)
Tata Capital Financial Services Limited
Vishal Gidde
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
